How do our personalities develop? What do we come with and what is built from our experiences? Once developed, how does personality work? These questions have been steeped in controversy for almost as long as psychology has existed.
In an article in Psychological Review, Carol Dweck tackles these issues. She proposes that our personalities develop around basic needs, and she begins by documenting the three basic psychological needs we all come with: the need to predict our world, the need to build competence to act on our world, and because we are social beings, the need for acceptance from others. (She also shows how new needs emerge later from combinations of these basic needs.)
Infants arrive highly prepared to meet these needs–they are brilliant, voracious learners on the lookout for need-relevant information. Then, as infants try to meet their needs, something important happens. They start building beliefs about their world and their role in it: Is the world good or bad, safe or dangerous? Can I act on my world to meet my needs? These beliefs, plus the emotions and action tendencies that are stored with them, are termed “BEATs.” They represent the accumulated experiences people have had trying to meet their needs, and they play a key role in personality–both the invisible and the visible parts of personality.
The invisible part of personality consists of the needs and BEATs. They form the basis of personality and they drive and guide the visible part. The visible part happens when the needs and BEATs create the actual goals people pursue in the world– what people actually do.
Take the following example. Some people are conscientious; they actively pursue achievement and exercise self-discipline and perseverance. That’s the visible part. Everyone has a need for competence, but how people pursue competence-whether they do so in a conscientious manner–will depend on their BEATs (the invisible part, such as their beliefs). Research shows that some people hold the belief that their abilities are simply fixed traits. When they are confronted with a challenging task, they may choose an easier one instead because the challenging task carries a risk. It could expose their fixed ability as deficient; it could undermine their sense of competence. However, other people believe that their abilities can be developed. They are more likely to welcome the challenging task and stick to it in the face of setbacks in order to develop their competence. They display the hallmarks of conscientiousness. In other words, underlying BEATs can have a pronounced effect on the visible “personality” people display as they pursue their goals.
Temperament can also be important. For example, if children are shy or fearful it can make certain needs (such as the need for predictability) stronger than others and it can affect the way they react to things that happen to them–both of which can mould the BEATs they develop and carry forward.
What are the implications of this theory? First, it means that our personality develops around our motivations (our needs and goals) and is not simply about traits we’re born with. The theory also reveals the invisible parts of personality and shows how we can identify and address important BEATs (particularly beliefs) to promote personality change.
In short, like large, classic theories of the last century, the current theory brings together our motivations, our personality, and our development within one framework and helps shed light on processes that contribute to well-being and human growth.
Carol S. Dweck, Ph.D., is one of the world’s leading researchers in the field of motivation and is the Lewis and Virginia Eaton Professor of Psychology at Stanford University. Her research has focused on how mindsets shape the goals people pursue and how effectively they pursue them.
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689-719. http://dx.
The APA Journals Article Spotlight features summaries written in collaboration with authors of recently published articles by the Journals Program of the American Psychological Association. The articles are nominated by the editors as noteworthy to the scientific community.
more recommended stories
Creativity is not just for the young, study finds
If you believe that great scientists.
Playing video games generally not harmful to boys’ social development
The popularity of interactive video games.
It doesn’t pay to play angry when negotiating
Don't bring anger into negotiation as.
Young people store 1.5 megabytes of information to master their native language
New research suggests language acquisition between.
The world’s adolescents — large unmet needs and growing inequalities
Today's adolescents make up the largest.
For infants, distinguishing between friends and strangers is a laughing matter
Study shows five-month-olds can make judgments.
In fiction, young people choose traditional love and gender stereotypes
Fictional television series can have an.
Children prefer friends who talk like they do
A preference for friends with similar.
Parents, kids spend more time discussing how to use mobile technology
Study found that parents spend more.
To prepare kids financially, give them practice with money
The process through which parents impart.